Quantcast
Latest Stories

Review: Google’s Nexus 7 guns for the Kindle


Google's Cheryl Pon shows off apps on the new Google Nexus 7 tablet at the Google I/O conference in San Francisco, Wednesday. The Nexus 7 will ship in mid-July starting at $199 — the same price as the Kindle Fire. By contrast, iPads start at $499. AP

NEW YORK—In the 1982 sci-fi movie “Blade Runner,” there are hints that the hero, played by Harrison Ford, is an artificial human — an “android” or “replicant.” His job is to go out and kill other, rogue androids.

If he’s an android, he’s of the latest model, Nexus 7. That’s also the name Google Inc. has picked for the first tablet to bear the Google brand. Clearly, its mission is to go out and kill rogue tablets running Google’s Android software.

Specifically, the Nexus 7 seems to have been designed to give anyone who bought a Kindle Fire from Amazon.com Inc. or a Nook Tablet from Barnes & Noble Inc. a lethal case of buyer’s remorse.

The Nexus 7 costs $199, the same that Amazon and Barnes & Noble charge for their tablets. But it’s better than theirs in significant ways, as it became clear to me after a couple of days of use. Google announced the tablet last week and is taking pre-orders for delivery in mid-July.

Why is Google targeting the Kindle Fire and the Nook Tablet? Because they’ve been relatively successful competitors to Apple Inc.’s iPad tablet, yet Google is getting no benefit from their success.

Google makes its Android operating software available for any device manufacturer to use. Amazon and Barnes & Noble took Android and modified it heavily. Namely, they took out the applications that point to Google’s services and the advertising it sells. Instead, the apps point to the companies’ own stores.

In other words, these tablets are rogue Androids.

Other tablets, such as Samsung’s Galaxy, use the “proper,” Googlish version of Android, but they’ve been more expensive than the Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet. Apparently, Google thought it was time to make a really good, proper Android tablet for $199.

It’s succeeded. As far as I can tell from my few days of use so far, the Nexus 7 is a really good value. It’s made by AsusTek Computer, a Taiwanese company that was originally planning to sell a similar tablet for $249.

The Nexus 7 is a plain black slab with a screen that’s 7 inches on the diagonal — the same size as the Nook and the Fire. The most noticeable feature it has over the competition is a low-resolution camera, facing the user. That means the Nexus 7 can be used for videoconferencing, but it’s nearly impossible to use for snapshots. It also has a microphone, which the Fire lacks, making Amazon’s device useless even for audio conferencing.

The screen has a higher resolution than the Fire, and colors look more vivid. The whole tablet is slightly thinner and appreciably lighter than the Fire.

Other nifty but invisible hardware upgrades on the Nexus 7 include Bluetooth and GPS chips for use with headsets and navigation software. The tablet even has a chip for near-field communications, which means it can “talk” to some phones and store payment terminals when tapped against them. I used the Nexus 7 to pay for toilet paper in a drugstore.

But the most important difference between the Nexus 7 and its prey is the software. Not only is it running stock Android, but it’s also the first device to run the latest version of Android. Google, with its trademark combination of cute and cutthroat, calls it “Jelly Bean.”

Stock Android gives Nexus 7 access to a much wider array of applications than its competitors, running into the hundreds of thousands. The diversity also applies to content: You can use a wider range of e-book stores and movie services on the Nexus 7. You can read Kindle books on the Nexus 7, for example, but you can’t read Google books on the Kindle.

Google does its best, though, to steer users to its “Play” store for apps, movies, music and books. Buyers even get a $25 credit toward store purchases, partly defraying the cost of the tablet itself.

With a powerful processing chip and plentiful RAM memory, the type available for running programs, the Nexus 7 is fast and slick. You can switch directly from application to application, something that isn’t possible with the Fire or Nook. They both force you to exit an application and go to the main menu before jumping into another one.

The chief issue buyers will likely bump into with the Nexus 7 is a lack of storage space. The $199 model has just 8 gigabytes of storage, and a quarter of that is overhead. It has just 5.9 gigabytes actually available. With downloads of a few applications, some songs and one movie, more than half was gone.

There’s a step-up model with 16 gigabytes of storage for $249, which I would highly recommend. There’s no option to expand storage with a memory card, a feature available with the Nook Tablet and many other Android tablets (but not the Kindle Fire, either).

Early buyers may also find that some applications will not work on it. Because Jelly Bean is the bleeding edge of Android, app developers haven’t had time to rewrite their products for it. I encountered this problem with a couple of applications.

Lastly, the size of the screen is going to frustrate some buyers — the ones who really wanted an iPad. The Nexus 7′s screen is a nice step from a smartphone screen, but the iPad is a really big step up. Magazines and full-page documents, for example, work great on the iPad screen, but are difficult to view on a 7-inch (17.5-centimeter) screen. The iPad also has the best selection and quality of third-party software.

In “Blade Runner,” one of the super-strong androids breaks two of the hero’s fingers, one by one. The Nexus 7 deserves a better reception.

It’s a great entry in the cheap-and-small tablet category, even if it’s not perfect. But then again, who is?

Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter




Recent Stories:

Police make new arrests in London soldier killing 37 mins elapsed Cars burning as Stockholm braces for fifth night of riots 53 mins elapsed Thunderstorms pummel US tornado disaster zone 1 hour elapsed US stocks end slightly lower after Asia, Europe rout 2 hours elapsed 7.4 magnitude quake strikes southwest of Tonga—USGS 2 hours elapsed Filipinos in flight want to go online 2 hours elapsed SMC pledges to put more capital in Liberty Telecom 2 hours elapsed Smart to stop offering ‘dumb’ phones 2 hours elapsed
Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Google , Nexus 7 , technology

  • PortlandOldtimer

    The Google Nexus 7 is very sad. I used to own a Motorola Xoom and it never worked right. I ended up ditching it for an Ipad 3. So I was excited to come back to Google and ordered the Nexus 7. Then I thought about and canceled two hours later. It has a single front facing camera at 1.2 MP. Really! The largest storage is 16 G Really! Every table I have owned I use between 18 and 20 G just out the gate. So I canceled. I was told I would receive an official cancellation within 48 hours. No cancelation came. I called and they said something must have happened and they would take care of it. No cancellation came. Five days later I check my credit card statement and they had charged me for the Nexus even though it was not going to ship in three weeks. The standard is charge when shipped. I called and they said it is just a pre charge. I said what is the point you will have to get an authorization anyway when you ship in the mean time they have put 272 on hold after I have called four times to cancel. Google is off the rails. Run do not walk away from this product. It is made by a manufacturer that has problems. Do Not Buy.

    • S_Deemer

      Interesting. I ordered a Nexus 7 just after the June 27 keynote finished. I just checked, and my credit card has not been charged, which is exactly as promised: “You’ve made a purchase on Google Play. You will not be charged until your order has shipped.”

      I have two laptops with front facing cameras that I have never used, apart from taking ID photos and a Google+ Hangout test. I also have a Linux netbook with a 32gb SSD, which still has 20gb of free space after 2 years of use. I also have a Chromebook, which has about 8.4mb of free space after 18 months use (including 8 downloaded books and several large PDF documents). Just in case I decide to crazy with local storage, I ordered the 16gb version of the Nexus 7, but I have no concerns about running out of storage.

      I give more credence to the large number of enthusiastic reviews in the past week over the complaints of a troll who can’t seem to find anything positive about any tablet.

      • PortlandOldtimer

        Well I can show you the credit card bill. I sure you can not dispute that. But regardless it is telling that you are new tablet user. Cameras on tablets are used for video chats. They are also used to take pictures. Obviously you do neither. Second, you are not a tablet user or a media user, obviously. If you were to use the Nexus like a tablet you will find that 16G is very limited. You can read any review and discover this. The Nexus fails in any serious measurement of Tablet usage. Do you watach movies? Have music files? Do you take videos with it? I am sure it will fine for answering emails and reading books. It is NOT a tablet that compares to the IPAD or the other tablets. Second, did you ask them what happened to Ice Cream Sandwich operating system? Do you know the history of Google with a new operating system. Honeycomb 3.0 was not right for maybe two or three releases. It only worked at 3.2. Good luck but you will regret this decision.

      • S_Deemer

        Obviously, the iPad is a better fit for your needs, which are different from my needs. I intend to store about 8gb of music locally. I do not watch movies. I do not record videos. For taking pictures, I prefer to use a real camera. 1.2 megapixels is fine for videoconferencing, and is higher resolution than the Macbook Air had until a month ago. I do not want a 10″ tablet; I’m looking for something light and more portable than an iPad, and the Nexus 7 fits the bill.

        ICS is Android 4.0; Jelly bean is Android 4.1, and by all accounts, it is a major refinement of ICS. Try running iOS 5 or higher on an iPod Touch. Try using Siri on an iPhone 4. In a few years, in all likelihood, Apple will release a version of iOS that will not run on your spanking new iPad. This is the nature of the computer business.

        The Nexus 7 is a perfect fit for my needs, and I have no doubt that I will not regret my decision. I don’t know what went wrong with your order, but mine is exactly as described by Google, and I have no reason for complaint.

      • PortlandOldtimer

        My point is that you are an atypical tablet user. I sure you will be happy, but it simply doss not fit the needs of the vast majority of tablet users who take pics, listen to music, watch videos, up date facebook pages with pics and videos, and use it overall as a media machine. The Nexus will fail as a tablet but I am sure it will find a few users with your limited needs.

      • S_Deemer

        May I point out that Amazon has sold more than 5 million Kindle Fires to “atypical” tablet users, and that out of the 18,730 KF reviews currently on Amazon, nearly 14,000 rate it 4 stars or higher. This is not to praise the KF, but even with its limited functionality, it seems to meet the needs of an awful lot of people, even if they are not the “vast majority”.

        I did not buy a KF (or a B&N Nook Color) because it doesn’t meet my needs, and after more than 30 years of working with computer systems of all sizes (IBM mainframe, CP/M, DOS, Windows, Unix, Linux, and every Macintosh OS since 1984), I have a pretty good understanding of my needs vs my wants. So do millions of other people whom you dismiss as outside the vast majority of tablet users.

      • PortlandOldtimer

        Are you serious? You are programmer so I know you can do the match and how to define typical. 55 million people have bought the Ipad. Five million have bought Kindle. So by any stretch of the imagination the larger number defines typical. You miss my point. Google missed the market here. The are shooting for a limited market where they should be shooting for the larger market and more profit with an Ipad killer. Since you are programmer, I hope you will understand this final comment. The Nexus in its current configuration can not show off what Jelly Bean is really capable of. The Nexus will not survive till Christmas.

      • S_Deemer

        The title of the article is “Google’s Nexus 7 guns for the Kindle” not “Google’s Nexus 7 guns for the iPad.”

        Check back at Christmas.

      • http://www.facebook.com/jasonconort Jason Conort

        Please stop trying to represent people, you really don’t. Thanks!

      • PortlandOldtimer

        Jason, where did I say I am representing any thing other my own views and my views as a Google shareholder? I am stating my opinion based on over 30 years of being a technology industry executive (now retired) and an avid technology buyer. (Kindle touch, Motorola Xoom, Ipad, and new Ipad. Even the ill fated Apple Newton of 1995. ) I have a right to log in and state my opinion. It is well formed without violation of any community rules of language or abuse. So let it run. It is my opinion, that Google wasted shareholder money and missed the market with this device.

  • NoWorryBHappy

    When everything that’s Apple is expensive, who cares about getting an Apple iPad.
    All we want is something useful and affordable. And Google Nexus 7 answers that need.
    Go Google Nexus 7!

    • PortlandOldtimer

      are you kidding? It is a dead machine. It only has 16 g of storage. Only one camera and only 1.2 MP at that. Go buy it. You will be sorry. I have owned three tablets now including the Motorola Xoom and at least the new IPAD words but it is still lame.

      • http://www.facebook.com/jasonconort Jason Conort

        The days of storing all of your media on a single device is dead. Why am i taking all of it with me, when its perfectly happy in the cloud. The camera sucks on most tablets, and only adds cost. Pretty sure a lot of people will buy this tablet and love it.

      • PortlandOldtimer

        I find it interesting that most people miss the two important things about my post. First, service at Google Play was terrible. They did not respond to four requests for cancellations and they charged my credit card two weeks before shipping. Second, Google missed the wrong market. They are going after the Kindle Fire market which is very tiny compared and were there is very little profit instead of going after kindle fire market. Lets compare 55 million in sales to to 5 million in sales and the education and business market waiting to be tapped. So how does that apply? If you are not going to make significant profit you are not going to keep producing the profit. Now, finally, Jason I have owned THREE tablets. I used the Cloud extensively. I DO NOT store everything on a device. But I average about 19 to 20 G of usage on all my tablets. I have never had less than that and only keep the media I need for a limited period of time.
        As to taking pictures, I own profesional grade equipment. However, there are times, as hundreds of million of Facebook users will attest you want to take a picture down and dirty. It adds to the value of the device. Not to include one is absurd. I grant you that many people have a camera on their phone. This is about corporate Vision at Google. I question it. Time will tell. My bet is that it is a dead device before Christmas. They will come out with a better version for about the $375 to $395 price point and you will be left with dead device. My guess is also that the buyers of Nexus are first time tablet buyers. They will not stick with it. and will regret it and jump to the new smaller screen Ipad at a lesser price with ALL of the above features. The Nexus is a wasted effort.



Copyright © 2013,
.
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • Police make new arrests in London soldier killing
  • Cars burning as Stockholm braces for fifth night of riots
  • Korean manager apologizes for Yellow Submarine hitting corals in Lapu-Lapu city
  • BO-PK, Pelaez file poll protests before Comelec
  • Mayor consoles Joavan in Cebu jail visit
  • Sports

  • Lady Bulldogs’ poor reception key in V-League finals game one downfall, says coach
  • Lady Eagles seize Game 1 in 3
  • Azkals call off Kyrgyzstan friendly
  • Caluscusin top rhythmic gymnast with 3 golds
  • Big Chill rounds out D-League semis cast
  • Lifestyle

  • Imperial and ‘monarchic’ scent–it could only be French
  • ‘Asian fit’ menswear by way of Savile Row
  • Punk meets history in first Chanel show in Asia
  • Wild cinnamon bark tea, berry wine, coco sugar brownies–Hindy Tantoco’s ‘Balik Bukid’ buys
  • Don’t be afraid of color, says this Japanese makeup artist
  • Entertainment

  • Graphic gay sex stirs controversy at Cannes
  • New show will have ‘Party Pilipinas’ team
  • Bella Flores Foundation planned
  • A heady dose of indie rock, fashion at Wanderland fest
  • Kapatid wishes Willie well
  • Business

  • US stocks end slightly lower after Asia, Europe rout
  • Landbank loan portfolio grows by 13%
  • Greenergy to cash in on China ventures
  • BSP adopts rules compliance rating system for PH banks
  • ‘Why are we getting more and more cynical about marketing, especially advertising?’
  • Technology

  • Filipinos in flight want to go online
  • SMC pledges to put more capital in Liberty Telecom
  • Smart to stop offering ‘dumb’ phones
  • DOJ wants online libel junked
  • Media watchdog criticizes UAE over tweeter’s jail term
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, May 24, 2013
  • Out of the doldrums
  • Fighting over champagne
  • The poor didn’t benefit
  • Post-op
  • Global Nation

  • PH, Taiwan seen to start talks on fishery agreement by June
  • Australia to PH aid totals P5.7B
  • Sex raps filed vs envoy–DFA
  • Gazmin: We’ll defend the shoal to the last soldier
  • Philippines turns to other tourist markets after Taiwan row
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    © Copyright 1997-2013 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved