Quantcast
Latest Stories

Blockbuster Apple-Samsung trial packs US court

By

In this April 19, 2011, file photo, Samsung Electronics’ Galaxy S, left, and Apple’s iPhone 4 are displayed at a mobile phone shop in Seoul, South Korea. Observers and lawyers packed a California courtroom Monday, July 30, 2012, for the blockbuster patent trial involving the two technology titans Apple and Samsung. Apple Inc. filed a lawsuit against Samsung Electronics Co. last year alleging the world’s largest technology company’s smart phones and computer tablets are illegal knockoffs. Samsung countered that it’s Apple that is doing the stealing. AP PHOTO/AHN YOUNG-JOON

SAN JOSE, California—Observers and lawyers packed a California courtroom Monday for the blockbuster patent trial involving two of the world’s technology titans, Apple and Samsung.

Before proceedings began, a line packed with dozens of people stretched far outside the federal courthouse in San Jose, California, in the heart of Silicon Valley.

With the courtroom at capacity, some journalists were required to sit in an overflow room to watch pre-trial proceedings by video ahead of planned jury selection.

Lawyers for Samsung asked US District Judge Lucy Koh to set last-minute limits on what Apple attorneys can present to jurors during opening statements.

A 10-person jury was to be selected Monday, followed by opening arguments.

Apple is seeking more than $2.5 billion in a case accusing the South Korean firm of infringing on designs and other patents from the iPhone and iPad maker.

Samsung counters that Apple infringed on its patents for wireless communication, so the jury will sort out the competing claims.

This is one of several cases in courts around the world involving the two big electronics giants in the hottest part of the tech sector, tablet computers and smartphones.

While the results so far have been mixed in courts in Europe and Australia, Samsung is clearly on the defensive in the US case.

Koh, who will preside in the jury case, has issued two temporary injunctions against US sales of Samsung’s 10-inch Galaxy tablet and the Galaxy Nexus smartphone developed with Google.

To make matters worse, a magistrate in the case ruled last week that Samsung failed to retain key evidence in the case by allowing e-mails to be destroyed after learning of the lawsuit.

That will mean Judge Koh can issue an “adverse inference” instruction to the jury.

R. Polk Wagner, a professor of patent law at the University of Pennsylvania, said the case is probably the biggest patent trial since the 1980s case involving photo giants Polaroid and Kodak, and is important because of its size and ability to set precedent.

“I see this as the first in what I expect to be many cases involving smartphone technology,” he told AFP.

“It remains to be seen what the impact will be even if Apple wins. Typically the patents are relatively easy to design around. So if Samsung loses a couple of rounds they may still be able to make their phones.”

But Samsung could face big risks: If Apple wins, it would automatically get a permanent injunction on sales of Samsung devices. And if Samsung makes only minor changes, Apple could ask for the Korean firm to be held in contempt.

The case has huge financial implications for both firms and the burgeoning industry for mobile devices.

A survey by research firm IDC showed Samsung shipped 50.2 million smartphones globally in the April-June period while Apple sold 26 million iPhones. IDC said Samsung held 32.6 percent of the market to 16.9 percent for Apple.

Samsung is the leading maker of smartphones using Google’s Android operating system, which has become the most popular platform despite complaints from Apple that it has infringed on its patents.

Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter




Recent Stories:

Demi Lovato is a work in progress 1 hour elapsed Stars’ ‘shameful’ secrets revealed 1 hour elapsed Penchant for loopy and messy details 1 hour elapsed Nora and Vilma go indie 1 hour elapsed Three inspiring real-life dramas at the polls 1 hour elapsed British fighter jets escort diverted Pakistani plane 1 hour elapsed News Corp approves split into two firms June 28 1 hour elapsed PH lits up Guinness for most sky lanterns flown simultaneously 2 hours elapsed
Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Apple , Internet , IT , patent , Samsung , South Korea , Trial , US

  • robrano

    Let’s hope Samsung will win. Their Galaxy is better than the super overpriced Apple products but costs much less. And Apple knows that and did not charge Samsung about technicalities but just about design. For that, near any brand of technical products could charge any others since all which is designed for effective and easy use will look very similar.
    Maybe Samsung, which now is selling twice than Apple and is now # 1 with its Galaxy, should stop to supply Apple with its chips/ Apple can not find immediately another supplier for millions of chips which would match their phones.
    Apple is more famous now for court cases than for real new inventions. It rides on its fans who buy at any price any “new” product, even there is very little new compared to the previous version. It is more like a fancy gadget at a luxury price and therefore a status symbol.
    Apple was innovative when Steve Jobs invented the mouse and an operating system which had not the memory limitations like Microsoft. at that time. But later when Windows had the same, it was near to vanish with its expensive software, mostly incompatible with the next OS version. Until Apple went mainly from computers to handys, where it released one after one new versions of near the same product, including the phone which started to burn when in a bag or pocket. 
    But is is clear Apple’s advantage that the US court will always favor the US firm. Like the US rating agencies downgrade european banks and countries which stand much better than the US economy. And which totally neglect that the recent financial crisis started in USA withacheating but AAA rated big bank.



Copyright © 2013,
.
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • PSG men ‘bemedaled’ prior to QC rob raps
  • China cordon drives fishers inland
  • DOH bats for ‘SEX’ in call centers
  • Polls solidify LP hold in most of Visayas
  • It pays to be corrupt
  • Sports

  • Philippines rules first Fiba Asia U18 3×3
  • Tough blow for FEU as forward Escoto down with an ACL tear
  • Djokovic, Nadal on semi-final collision
  • St. Benilde uses fourth quarter turnaround to stun FEU
  • Fourth quarter surge helps Adamson keeps UP winless
  • Lifestyle

  • Call center workers told to have more ‘sex’ in their lives
  • Imperial and ‘monarchic’ scent–it could only be French
  • ‘Asian fit’ menswear by way of Savile Row
  • Punk meets history in first Chanel show in Asia
  • Wild cinnamon bark tea, berry wine, coco sugar brownies–Hindy Tantoco’s ‘Balik Bukid’ buys
  • Entertainment

  • Demi Lovato is a work in progress
  • Stars’ ‘shameful’ secrets revealed
  • Penchant for loopy and messy details
  • Nora and Vilma go indie
  • Three inspiring real-life dramas at the polls
  • Business

  • Stocks continue to decline
  • BSP chief says capital flight to spare PH
  • Imports contracted in Q1
  • MBC, FPI buck halt to oil smuggling case vs Phoenix
  • AirAsia completes deal with Zest Airways
  • Technology

  • Yahoo takes big leap with $1.1B deal for Tumblr
  • Poll: More US teens turn to Twitter; Facebook old
  • Tips to avoid becoming an identity theft victim
  • Filipinos in flight want to go online
  • SMC pledges to put more capital in Liberty Telecom
  • Opinion

  • Brillantes’ tantrums
  • Pointed questions for the Comelec chair
  • Social enterprise as innovative business model
  • Perennial irony
  • Voters like election surveys
  • Global Nation

  • Lapid’s wife back in PH after US probation for cash smuggling—immigration exec
  • Russian’s Mayon caper cost gov’t P520 K
  • 2 former sex slaves cancel Japan mayor meeting
  • Brown hounded for calling Manila ‘gates of hell’
  • PH, Taiwan seen to start talks on fishery agreement by June
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    © Copyright 1997-2013 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved