Quantcast
Latest Stories

Apple scores huge win over Samsung in patent case


SAN JOSE, California – Apple won more than $1 billion in a massive US court victory over Samsung on Friday, in one of the biggest patent cases in decades — a verdict that could have huge market repercussions.

A jury in San Jose, California awarded $1.049 billion to the US tech giant, according to reports from the courtroom. But analysts said the damages could be tripled because jurors found Samsung “willfully” infringed on patents.

The jury rejected the South Korean electronics firm’s counterclaims against Apple, which had claimed its iconic iPhone and iPad had been illegally copied, according to live court reports from the tech sites The Verge and Cnet.

Samsung reacted by saying the verdict was “a loss” for consumers and that Apple had “manipulated” the patent system.

The South Korean firm also said the verdict was “not the final word” in this case or other similar battles around the world.

“Today’s verdict should not be viewed as a win for Apple, but as a loss for the American consumer,” Samsung said.

“It is unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners, or technology that is being improved every day by Samsung and other companies… Samsung will continue to innovate and offer choices for the consumer.”

The decision appeared to be an overwhelming victory for Apple, but it was not immediately clear if it would halt sales of Samsung devices or affect newer models released since the case was filed.

“This is a huge, crushing win for Apple,” said Brian Love, a professor of patent law at Santa Clara University.

“All of its patents were held valid, and all but one were held to be infringed by most or all accused Samsung products. Even better for the company, five of the seven patents were held to be willfully infringed by Samsung.”

Love said this means that Judge Lucy Koh “now has the discretion to triple Apple’s damages award, which is already a monstrous and unprecedented” sum.

The case, which is almost certain to face appeal, could shake up the sizzling market for mobile devices in which Apple has been losing ground to rivals like Samsung that use the free Android system developed by Google.

“Samsung is a proxy for both Google and the other Android vendors and better protected than most,” said analyst Rob Enderle of the Enderle Group.

“I think this will force a reset on Android products as they are reengineered to get around Apple’s patents.”

The jury decided the case with over 700 separate claims in less than three days of deliberations.

In one minor snag, the judge sent them back Friday after discovering they had made damage awards for two devices not found to have infringed, and the jurors then revised the award, which had been $1.051 billion, reports said.

The verdict affects patents on a range of Samsung products including some of its popular Galaxy smartphones and its Galaxy 10 tablet — devices alleged to have been copied from the iPhone and iPad.

But some devices are not affected, including the flagship Galaxy III S recently released, although they could be targeted in separate litigation.

Technology analyst Jeff Kagan said of the verdict: “This is a great day for Apple. And it will turn into a very expensive day for Samsung.”

Kagan said it was not immediately clear if Samsung would be able to continue to use the technology and pay Apple for the right to do so, or if they must pull their devices and redesign them.

In any case, the verdict in the case — one of several pending in global courts — is likely to have massive repercussions in the hottest part of the technology sector, smartphones and tablets.

Even a delay in sales could endanger Samsung’s position in the US market, where it is currently the top seller of smartphones.

A survey by research firm IDC showed Samsung shipped 50.2 million smartphones globally in the April-June period, while Apple sold 26 million iPhones. IDC said Samsung held 32.6 percent of the market to 16.9 percent for Apple.

Samsung had steadfastly denied the charges by Apple, claiming it developed its devices independently, and countersued in the case, seeking more than $400 million for infringement on its wireless patents.

The verdict came the same day a South Korean court ruled Apple and Samsung infringed on each other’s patents on mobile devices, awarding damages to both technology giants and imposing a partial ban on product sales in South Korea.

The court banned sales in South Korea of Apple’s iPhone 4 and iPad 2, as well as Samsung’s Galaxy S and Galaxy SII among other products.

Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter




Recent Stories:

Man City beats Chelsea 4-3 in US friendly 4 mins elapsed ‘Before You Exit’ seeks to ‘influence’ Circuit Fest Saturday 16 mins elapsed Brown hounded for calling Manila ‘gates of hell’ 43 mins elapsed Yen weakens in Asian trade 45 mins elapsed Highway bridge collapses in US; people in water 1 hour elapsed 14 partylist groups proclaimed 2 hours elapsed Prince Edward presents Edinburgh’s awards in US 2 hours elapsed Nadal favored, but not seeded No. 1 at French Open 2 hours elapsed
Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Apple , infotech , patent , Samsung , smartphones , Tablets

  • californiaflip

    BTW, while $1B is big to Filipinos, it is small compared to the publicity Samsung is getting out of this case. They earned $4.46B in profit from just last quarter, so $1B for copying to be the 2nd largest phone maker in the world is well worth it. Many users are now asking what does Apple fear about Samsung? Maybe Samsung is a good phone? Samsung spends $1B a quarter just on advertising.

  • oh_noh

    aFOOL s*cks!!!
    sa california ba naman yung kaso, ano pa naman ang magiging desisyon?!?!?

  • jinndq

    Despite the jurors dubious findings in favour of Apple, the results have led to a bad taste in the mouths of millions of iPhone users, which are already bitter from the previously successful strategy of Apple in making close platform cheap phones via China OEMs and selling them at highly marked-up Exorbitant prices to US customers.

    Apple could get away with this in the past due to its hedgemony in the North American market, but this is no more. Samsung and the likes of Hua Wei are here to stay. Same applies to the ever enlarging market share and dominance of Open Source smartphone OS platforms like Android and the resurrection of Meego via Jolla.

    Many will now turn their backs on iPhones and MacBook Air s when there’s the choice of more technological advance, innovative and user friendly alternatives at more competitive prices as can be found with the soon to be released Quadcore Samsung Galaxy Note 2 with inbuilt LTE or 4G support and the highly reviewed Samsung Series 9 Ultrabooks.

    But the most destructive result from this farcical trial its that if Apple tries to produce a phablet With A Stylus Interface, which has proven to be hugely popular amongst international smartphone users, it has set a precedent for Samsung to sue Apple for billions of dollars and ban future Apple stylus driven smartphones in the USA.

  • Matang_Lawin

    For all of the commenters here. Samsung is not singled out. With this trial, this is unprecedented 1, 049, 000,000 reasons not to mess with Apple. I personally love it that Apple won this case as Samsung has repeatedly copied Apple even showing in their internal documents.. The gall of this company just to get by by copying years and years of hardwork and research.

    I hope the Judge triples the damages to cripple Samsung.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/DHMMKSXZME5MGTL7VZKX26TXXY Edgar Jerome E.

    Please respect the families of the victims. Let them decde.



Copyright © 2013,
.
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • Highway bridge collapses in US; people in water
  • 14 partylist groups proclaimed
  • Prince Edward presents Edinburgh’s awards in US
  • Social worker abducted in Basilan freed–authorities
  • Rain in Metro Manila, parts of PH due to cold front–Pagasa
  • Sports

  • Man City beats Chelsea 4-3 in US friendly
  • Nadal favored, but not seeded No. 1 at French Open
  • Lady Bulldogs’ poor reception key in V-League finals game one downfall, says coach
  • Lady Eagles seize Game 1 in 3
  • Azkals call off Kyrgyzstan friendly
  • Lifestyle

  • Imperial and ‘monarchic’ scent–it could only be French
  • ‘Asian fit’ menswear by way of Savile Row
  • Punk meets history in first Chanel show in Asia
  • Wild cinnamon bark tea, berry wine, coco sugar brownies–Hindy Tantoco’s ‘Balik Bukid’ buys
  • Don’t be afraid of color, says this Japanese makeup artist
  • Entertainment

  • ‘Before You Exit’ seeks to ‘influence’ Circuit Fest Saturday
  • Graphic gay sex stirs controversy at Cannes
  • New show will have ‘Party Pilipinas’ team
  • Bella Flores Foundation planned
  • A heady dose of indie rock, fashion at Wanderland fest
  • Business

  • Yen weakens in Asian trade
  • Hong Kong stocks open 0.35 percent higher
  • Cockroaches can sense danger in sugar
  • US stocks end slightly lower after Asia, Europe rout
  • Landbank loan portfolio grows by 13%
  • Technology

  • Filipinos in flight want to go online
  • SMC pledges to put more capital in Liberty Telecom
  • Smart to stop offering ‘dumb’ phones
  • DOJ wants online libel junked
  • Media watchdog criticizes UAE over tweeter’s jail term
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, May 24, 2013
  • Out of the doldrums
  • Fighting over champagne
  • The poor didn’t benefit
  • Post-op
  • Global Nation

  • Brown hounded for calling Manila ‘gates of hell’
  • PH, Taiwan seen to start talks on fishery agreement by June
  • Australia to PH aid totals P5.7B
  • Sex raps filed vs envoy–DFA
  • Gazmin: We’ll defend the shoal to the last soldier
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    © Copyright 1997-2013 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved