Quantcast
Latest Stories

Samsung: Apple trying to limit consumer choice


Samsung Electronics’ Galaxy S III, right, and Apple’s iPhone 4S are displayed at a mobile phone shop in Seoul, South Korea, Friday, Aug. 24, 2012. South Korea’s Samsung won a home court ruling in its global smartphone battle against Apple on Friday when Seoul judges said the company didn’t copy the look and feel of the U.S. company’s iPhone, and that Apple infringed on Samsung’s wireless technology. However, in a split decision on patents, the panel also said Samsung violated Apple technology behind the bounce-back feature when scrolling on touch screens, and ordered both sides to pay limited damages. AP/Ahn Young-joon

SEOUL, South Korea—Samsung on Saturday accused Apple of resorting to litigation in an effort to limit consumer choice after the iPhone maker said it was seeking to stop the sale of Galaxy S III smartphones in the United States.

Fresh from its $1 billion court victory over Samsung Electronics Co, Apple Inc. asked a federal district court in San Jose, California, on Friday to add four more Samsung products to a list of Samsung goods that Apple says infringe its patents.

The new list of 21 products includes Samsung’s flagship smartphone Galaxy S III as well as the Galaxy Note, another popular Android phone. If the court finds those devices are infringing Apple’s patents and irreparably harming the U.S. company, it could temporarily halt sales in the U.S. market even before the trial begins.

The latest accusation is part of a larger, epic struggle over patents and innovation in one of the most lucrative consumer electronics sectors that is unfolding in 10 countries.

The biggest stakes are in the U.S., the world’s largest smartphone market in 2011. Last month, a jury in the San Jose court found that Samsung had copied Apple’s design innovations and Samsung was ordered to pay Apple $1.05 billion. Samsung has vowed to appeal the verdict, all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.

On Saturday, Samsung denounced Apple’s attempt to halt sales of the S III, which hit the 10 million global sales mark in July, less than three months after its release.

“Apple continues to resort to litigation over market competition in an effort to limit consumer choice,” Samsung said in a statement. “We will continue to take the necessary legal measures to ensure the availability of our innovative products in the United States.”

The strong sales of the S III were crucial in driving Samsung’s quarterly profit to a record high in the last quarter and helped it stay ahead in the worldwide smartphone market.

In documents filed with San Jose federal district court on Friday, Apple said 21 Samsung smartphones, media players and tablets released after August 2011 were “copycat products.”

“Rather than innovate and develop its own technology and a unique Samsung style for its smartphone and tablet computer products, Samsung has chosen to copy Apple’s technology, user interface, and innovative style,” Apple said in one document.

The Cupertino, California-based company claimed that Samsung is illegally using its eight patents. One patent is related to the way the device retrieves information in a computer system and another is about gestures on a touchscreen display to unlock a device.

Apple and Samsung are the world’s two largest smartphone makers and together they control over half of the global market. They are embroiled in similar legal tussles in Asia, Europe and the United States.

In April 2011, Apple first accused Samsung of illegally copying Apple’s design and technology in the smartphones powered by Google Inc.’s Android technology. Samsung countersued, arguing Apple’s iPhone and iPad used its wireless technology without permission.

Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter




Recent Stories:

May fluvial parade is for women devotees of ‘Ina’ 4 mins elapsed Emano changes mind, files protest 13 mins elapsed Cambodian film tops Un Certain Regard 21 mins elapsed Change kids’ mindset on Muslims–OPAPP 25 mins elapsed Cannes: ‘The Immigrant’ stirs emotional response 35 mins elapsed Read-Along at 6 picks celebs as ambassadors 5 hours elapsed Mt. Pulag revisited: Quo vadis? 5 hours elapsed Sky lanterns light up Iloilo sky, set world record 5 hours elapsed
Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Apple , Copyright , Galaxy S III , iPhone , Samsung , Smartphone , technology

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/J4WK4GQJ4HMNJTAOOBKOOYF7JM jeff

    I would rather have a limited choice than having to choose with copy cat phones.

  • speedstream2

    Is this the new business protocol: If you can’t keep up with your competitor because the production costs are too stiff for comfort, move your business to China. And if that is not an option, hit your competitor with a string of cases aimed at its pocket, where it hurts the most?

    • Irwin Chavez

      not at all. it’s about respect. people always see the effects of such actions today (that Apple is greedy blah blah blah! how about Microsoft?). but what if we go back and let Apple do what it has done (with the iPhone and iPad) and Samsung not infringe any of Apple’s patents. we would’ve seen phones with night and day differences in performance and user experience. Samsung would probably be in the same boat as Nokia and Motorola. but nobody seems to sympathize with either company. Samsung took the easy way, plain and simple.

      remember what Samsung’s pre-iPhone models were like? yes, clamshells and slide up! and post-iPhone? one- to 3-button soapbars with touchscreen! the source of Samsung’s choice of form factor was revolutionary! why not? they also thought that the iPhone was cool!

  • John Sulayman

    Whatever happened to creativity in competition? Now it’s all about “stop copying me.”

    If that’s the case, manufacturers/makers of, but not limited to, TVs, cars, laptops, maletas, watches, and the like should all have been suing each other by now.

  • aim_up

    Do what is right . . . if you steal something, you either return it and stop using it, or pay up ! 

    That’s just the universal truth ! American, Japanese, Korean, Filipino, doesn’t matter.

    Intellectual properties must be respected by everyone.

  • Lord4u

    Koreans are notorious even in copying designs of cars; so what else is new?  A glaring example is their Hyundai copied from Mercedes Benz.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/NCS56KXZXFRFXWXWUPYAYTBQYA penetrator

      Apple wants only two choices for consumers: Apple or Apple.

      • Irwin Chavez

        yeah, right! and it’s the 
        exact same thing inside Samsung’s head! talk about hypocrisy!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=585259541 Pierre Albert San Diego

    Wow, Apple’s hypocrisy is just frustrating. Like they didn’t copy from Palm, Sony Ericsson, and Motorola.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/NCS56KXZXFRFXWXWUPYAYTBQYA penetrator

       Apple wants only two choices for consumers: Apple or Apple.

    • PolarBear

      even from nokia… like we filipinos always say: ang magnanakaw galit sa kapwa magnanakaw… gaya-gaya puto maya. =)

  • AmpJr

    What else is new??Apple wanted to monopolized the market…GREED is the only reason….Apples product and gadgets are expensive compared to Samsungs and other brands..

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/NCS56KXZXFRFXWXWUPYAYTBQYA penetrator

      Apple don’t have to make phones and tablets
      anymore to remain the Most Valuable Company. All they have to do is sue
      everyone, because for Apple they invented everything in this world.

      Apple would say…we existed since the Garden of Eden. So all the things in this world are copied from us. We are the root of all sins after all…LOL

    • Irwin Chavez

      are Apple products really expensive? maybe. but are they priced reasonably? name a phone model, tablet, or computer from any other manufacturer that can match the stability and user experience you get from Apple stuff?

      to Samsung owners out there, when was the last time your Android phone froze? iPhone users?

  • generalproblem

    i think apple just want to remind samsung to make its own innovation not copying.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/NCS56KXZXFRFXWXWUPYAYTBQYA penetrator

      Samsung did not copy, they gave consumers freedom of choice. Apple = Dictatorship. Samsumg = Democracy



Copyright © 2013,
.
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • May fluvial parade is for women devotees of ‘Ina’
  • Emano changes mind, files protest
  • Change kids’ mindset on Muslims–OPAPP
  • It’s Furlough Friday for federal workers
  • Church revenge: Buhay says Catholic vote was key
  • Sports

  • Vengeful Beermen destroy Slammers
  • Ateneo goes for sweep
  • Que fires career-low 62, rules Orchard by four
  • Warriors foil Archers; Lions, Chiefs triumph
  • Paragua still leads
  • Lifestyle

  • A life well lived
  • Kevin Tan takes a bride
  • In Tokyo, Bulgari dazzlers amid the sakura blooms
  • Desperately seeking Sarah Jessica
  • Don’t let your husband be the be-all and end-all of your existence
  • Entertainment

  • Cambodian film tops Un Certain Regard
  • Cannes: ‘The Immigrant’ stirs emotional response
  • Julie Delpy on life at 40
  • It takes two to do the show biz breakup cha-cha
  • Juday: Violence against women unacceptable
  • Business

  • Coco sugar sweetens small town’s finances
  • Along Mt. Bulusan’s foothills: A balmy ‘agricultural resort’
  • For Mona Serrano, there is no ‘escape’ from entrepreneurship
  • Buildings designed with unique character finding market
  • 18 Avon top sellers get a car each in ‘lipstick red’ shade
  • Technology

  • A new way for Filipinos to connect on social media launched
  • Statement of Smart Communications
  • Yahoo takes big leap with $1.1B deal for Tumblr
  • Poll: More US teens turn to Twitter; Facebook old
  • Tips to avoid becoming an identity theft victim
  • Opinion

  • Deep impact
  • The return of traditional politics in Pampanga
  • Most important investment incentive
  • Making (and keeping) friends
  • The Trinity and us
  • Global Nation

  • Sky lanterns light up Iloilo sky, set world record
  • Filipino WWII veterans used to cover up for senators’ inaction on family unification
  • Warship from US here next month
  • Taiwan has new terms
  • Taipei welcomes start of fisheries talks with PH
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    © Copyright 1997-2013 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved