Quantcast
Latest Stories

US congressional panel probes China tech firms

By

WASHINGTON — U.S. lawmakers on Thursday will question executives of two major Chinese technology companies as part of a congressional probe into whether those firms’ ambitions to carve out a bigger niche in the American market pose a threat to national security.

The House Intelligence Committee is probing Huawei Technologies Ltd., which was founded by a former Chinese military engineer and has grown to become the world’s second-largest supplier of telecoms network gear. Also under scrutiny is its rival ZTE Corp., which is partly state-owned and is the world’s fourth largest mobile phone manufacturer.

Lawmakers fear the companies could pose an espionage risk. Those concerns have hampered Huawei and ZTE’s expansion in the U.S., particularly beyond selling mobile devices to the provision of network infrastructure. They deny being a security threat.

The committee is expected to finalize its investigation in early October.

Thursday’s hearing might also raise with ZTE alleged sales of banned U.S.-sanctioned computer equipment to Iran. The company is facing a Commerce Department investigation into such sales, and the FBI is probing allegations the company obstructed that investigation.

ZTE says it welcomes the hearing as an opportunity to respond to criticism that associates them directly with the Chinese government and competitor companies. They also want to provide security assurances to enable their entry into the lucrative U.S. network infrastructure market.

“We respect the U.S. government’s security concerns,” ZTE senior vice president Zhu Jinyun said ahead of Thursday’s hearing. “We need to work together to find a solution for those concerns, and this should be our start.”

The committee has requested exhaustive information from both Huawei and ZTE on their ownership structures and connections to the Chinese government and Communist Party, saying it wants to establish if they can truly act as private companies. It has sought details of meetings over the past five years and credit received through state institutions.

That reflects abiding U.S. suspicion over cyberattacks on foreign governments and companies that have originated in China. The Obama administration has sought deeper ties with Beijing, but relations have been strained on security, trade and human rights — issues that Republican and Democrat lawmakers alike often speak out on.

Seeking to allay security concerns, Huawei this month issued a report on cybersecurity that includes a pledge never to cooperate with spying. It says its equipment is used by 45 of the world’s 50 biggest phone companies.

On Tuesday, Huawei’s founder, Ren Zhengfei, met with British Prime Minister David Cameron and announced plans to invest $2 billion to expand its operation in Britain.

Huawei, however, has released few details about who controls a company which still fuels suspicions abroad. Australia in April barred the company from bidding to work on a planned high-speed Internet network due to concerns about cyberattacks traced to China. The company had to unwind its purchase of a U.S. computer company, 3Leaf Systems, last year after it failed to win approval from a government security panel.

In Washington, Huawei vice-president for external affairs, William Plummer, said that because of overlapping nature of global supply chains, addressing the vulnerability of networks required universal standards rather than scrutiny of a single company.

He said Huawei would never compromise the integrity of its customers’ networks — which accounts for more than 70 percent of its business outside China — as it would be “corporate suicide.”

Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter




Recent Stories:

PH urges Taiwan to protect Filipino workers 2 hours elapsed 4M youth to get second chance at education 2 hours elapsed Palace rejects Taiwan allegation of murder 2 hours elapsed Free Inquirer tablets for lucky INQSnap readers 3 hours elapsed Crisis not all that bad for Greek mothers 3 hours elapsed Marikina City fire traced to second-hand ref 4 hours elapsed Int’l migrant group appeals for protection of Filipino workers in Taiwan 4 hours elapsed ‘Election is over, let’s work together’—Nancy Binay 5 hours elapsed
Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Chinese technology , Huawei Technologies , US Congress , ZTE Corp

  • ano ikaw

    Known fact that the Chinese have been stealing technology from the US.

    And now the USA, as fool as they have been, realized that it was too late.

    China’s technology is growing at their expense.

    No surprise .

  • http://www.facebook.com/vicespir2952 Victor Espiritu

    And the most stinky too

  • http://www.facebook.com/vicespir2952 Victor Espiritu

    The most untrustworthy people in the planet!

  • CyberPinoy

    what ever is the outcome it is still a chinese company, the west should be very careful in allowing business with them. The west might be giving technology to a rival country with hegemony aspirations..

  • Charlie Chan Comes To Town

    The exact genesis of Huawei is difficult to pinpoint. But the US Congress and the Brits should know better. Huawei was not built overnight. It was built centuries ago when the East finally met West. The Brits used to call it East India Co. It benefited from slave trade, the opium war, the tea trade, forex manipulation, proceeds from the summer palace loot and many more. Even the Delano relatives of Pres Franklin Roosevelt can attest to this. The US Congress might end up embarassing themselves should they decide to dig deeper. Somewhere in that ownership, there’s drug money too from the CIA’s golden triangle activities from the 1970s to 1980s. It’s all documented by Alfred McCoy. Let us know what you find.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_VDMUJ6NKKCLWRMVMJRLJFI633I Rene V

       you might be talking about HSBC. the CIA drug money scandal in the 70′s and 80′s has been exposed and people were punished. such is the openness and transparency of American society (unlike China or China’s leaders to be more direct). whatever more findings to be uncovered, you need not worry that the US Congress would be embarrassed (it does not have China’s attitude of being onion skinned). the most important issue now is about the security of the country. mind you, Australia banned the company from engaging in more substantial business because of security considerations. the US should do no less.

      • Charlie Chan Comes To Town

        HSBC? You’re way out of your depth kiddo. Nice try.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_VDMUJ6NKKCLWRMVMJRLJFI633I Rene V

         speak for yourself. i wonder how people can ask the long dead Delano relatives of FDR about the British East India Company? nice try kiddo.

      • Charlie Chan Comes To Town

        Thanks for admitting you’re ignorant. Here’s some bone for you little muchacho.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_VDMUJ6NKKCLWRMVMJRLJFI633I Rene V

        go to your doctor. you read wrong and have blurred vision. you might want to go to your psychiatrist, your fantasies control you too much.

      • DannyGane

        both of you, you better sweat it out…



Copyright © 2013,
.
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • Comelec proclaims final three senators
  • Nancy Binay: It’s just starting to sink in
  • It’s final: 9-3 for Team PNoy
  • PPCRV: Protecting the vote knows no generation gap
  • Poll watchdog says it was worse than 2010 elections
  • Sports

  • ABL: Beermen survive 3 OTs to down Dragons
  • Lions repulse Tams; Warriors crush Tigers
  • Adamson, NU clash for last finals berth
  • Good poll results for many PBA hosts
  • US training pays off as returning San Beda nips FEU at Filoil Flying V
  • Lifestyle

  • Make the good choice with Android Handsets
  • Caribbean talks conservation on Branson’s island
  • My (forced) Boracay summer of 2013
  • Daisy Hontiveros Avellana–Why she will always be the ‘First Lady of Philippine Theater’
  • ‘The only thing wrong with the Filipino audience is that there isn’t enough of it’
  • Entertainment

  • Flamboyant celeb wins back beau via intrigue
  • Leaving a coliseum full of positive vibes
  • Ser Chief, Maya in Toronto today
  • HEARD: Celeb poll volunteer
  • J.J. Abrams: Wildly exciting to direct new ‘Star Wars’
  • Business

  • Save more, Filipinos urged
  • A riverine venture in Pangasinan
  • N. Luzon fiesta maker to market former US military property
  • PSE board gets new mandate
  • World hypertension day: Know your numbers
  • Technology

  • Free Inquirer tablets for lucky INQSnap readers
  • Hong Kong launches first electric taxis
  • DepEd website now up and normal
  • Report: Yahoo nearing $1.1B acquisition of Tumblr
  • ‘Sonic’ video games coming to Nintendo
  • Opinion

  • An interesting challenge
  • Premature, imprudent and illegal
  • Nations and their governments
  • Come, Holy Spirit!
  • A room in heaven
  • Global Nation

  • Overseas voting turnout very low
  • How overseas Filipinos voted (Partial and unofficial)
  • How our OFW’s voted in the 2013 elections
  • Remembering the victims of that tragic limousine accident
  • How to deal with ‘unli-give me’ from relatives
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    © Copyright 1997-2013 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved