Quantcast

LG seeks ban on Samsung tablet sales in Korea



SEOUL–South Korea’s LG display said Friday it had asked a Seoul court to ban the domestic sale of Samsung’s Galaxy Note 10.1 tablet computer, citing alleged patent infringements.

The company, in the injunction filed on Wednesday, accused Samsung Electronics of infringing three of its patents on the liquid crystal display (LCD) panels used on the Galaxy Note.

“Through this action, LG Display seeks to completely stop the sale, manufacture and importation of the infringing Samsung product,” LG Display said in a press release.

LG Display also said it would request compensation amounting to 1.0 billion won ($933,000) per day in the event of continued non-compliance.

The two companies have been in a patent row since September when LG Display — one of the world’s top flat-screen TV makers — filed suits against Samsung Electronics and Samsung Display for allegedly infringing patents on seven organic light-emitting diode (OLED)-related technologies.

LG said that five of Samsung’s products, including its global hit Galaxy S-series smartphones and tablet computer Galaxy Tab, infringed its patents.

Later the same month, Samsung filed a court complaint accusing LG of luring away senior Samsung OLED researchers even though they had signed contracts preventing them working for a rival.

Samsung is no stranger to patent battles. The company and its arch rival Apple have filed lawsuits against each other in around a dozen countries for alleged patent violations over competing products, in particular the iPhone and Galaxy S smartphones, as well as tablet computers.

Earlier this month, a US judge denied Apple’s request to ban a set of Samsung smartphones from the US market after a jury found the South Korean electronics giant guilty of patent infringement.

Samsung, the world’s top mobile and smartphone maker, was ordered by a US jury in August to pay Apple $1.05 billion (800 million euros) in damages for illegally copying iPhone and iPad features for its flagship Galaxy S phones.

Samsung has appealed the ruling. Since then, two separate rulings by courts in Japan and The Netherlands have dismissed Apple’s claims of patent infringement.









Recent Stories:

Filipino, Swedish arrested in credit card, ATM fraud in Thailand 30 mins elapsed Emperador to debut on PSEi Sept. 15 32 mins elapsed ‘SC issue on SALN shouldn’t be cause of conflict with Malacañang’ 39 mins elapsed Binay breaks silence on carpark row, accuses Trillanes of witness intimidation 48 mins elapsed AFP verifying Nur sighting, says he has to face law 54 mins elapsed NP’s Jonvic Remulla is new spokesman for Vice President Binay 54 mins elapsed DOJ mulls placing Binay accusers under witness protection program 55 mins elapsed RCBC to issue new negotiable certificates of time deposit 1 hour elapsed
Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_5EV2FNQUSNLESIPZKVIR43JSCI Juan Dela cruz

    Why don`t they just pay each other for royalties or license, they earned billions of dollars every year! Why resort with this kind of law suits, instead of improving those crap smartphones.. With your actions being at the same Country, China now is stealing your technology and trying to make their own smartphones, ICs, TVs, etc… China even has now factory for generic android smartphones where countries can buy and re-brand their smartphones, for example the Cherry Mobile, MyPhone… etc, all made in China…

  • pnoy0612

    boycott Apple products, made in china…

    samsung is better, more features and better options…



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement Advertisement
Advertisement
Marketplace