Quantcast

Business at satellite speed

By , |


Philippine satellite Agila 2, which Mabuhay Satellite Communications Inc. (MSC), a subsidiary of Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co., sold to Bermuda-based Asia Broadcast Satellite Holdings Ltd. (ABS) in January 2009. PHOTO FROM MABUHAYSAT.COM

MANILA, Philippines—The private sector must now take the lead in restoring the Philippines’ presence in space.

The government is beset by economic, national security and other concerns that limit its ability to spearhead the lofting of a new Philippine satellite that will assist in the expansion of national services beyond our crowded metropolitan regions and help sustain the high economic growth we are experiencing.

Growth at this level can be stymied without the critical infrastructure satellite communications can provide.

By its immunity from terrestrial disasters such as typhoons, a satellite can enhance long-distance communications and expand wireless broadband Internet coverage across our entire archipelago.

National security, disaster preparedness and distance learning are just a few of the many benefits a satellite orbiting serenely in space will support.

For businesses, a satellite enhances the point-to-multipoint communications that can boost sales and cut costs. It also expands broadband access to the Internet, which is undoubtedly the home page of 21st century business. A satellite allows companies to have national presence from the first day of service without the costly terrestrial infrastructure that accompanies cellular and cabled services.

A necessity

Current business, national security and national development issues make it essential that the Philippines have its own dedicated space communications satellite to replace Agila-2, formerly the country’s only satellite that now orbits the Earth over the Middle East as ABS-3.

In January 2009, Mabuhay Satellite Communications Inc. (MSC), a subsidiary of Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co., sold Agila-2 to Bermuda-based Asia Broadcast Satellite Holdings Ltd. (ABS) for some P400 million, extinguishing the Philippines’ lone foothold in space.

The loss of our only Philippine satellite was a severe blow to the country’s technological independence. It means that we continue to depend on satellites of competitor states for strategic business and military telecommunications.

Even worse is to not do anything about the loss of our own satellite in a digital age where technology multiplies national strength. This inaction will only serve to hold future Filipinos hostage to the whims of other nations.

Left behind

The Philippines is the only country among the top five richest Southeast Asian states without its own communications satellite. That must change.

Indonesia has nine satellites; Malaysia has four; Singapore, nine; and Thailand, five. Even Vietnam now has its own satellites. In May 2012, Vietnam orbited Vinasat 2, its second satellite.

The business and security issues facing the Philippines today present both greater opportunities and greater threats that can successfully be addressed by a satellite dedicated to the Philippines’ unique interests.

At the business end, a Philippine satellite can help provide the massive bandwidth required by mobile devices such as smartphones, tablet computers and laptops for high-speed, broadband Internet on demand, anytime, anywhere.

Satellite Internet can deliver download speeds in the hundreds of megabytes per second in contrast to the hundreds of kilobytes per second in terrestrial technologies such as 3G.

“Satellites can help return the Philippines to where it was more than 40 years ago when it was at the head of Asia, using technology to facilitate nationwide economic development and security, and not at the back of Asia,” said Tom van der Heyden, an American national and a leading satellite communications expert.

He believes a satellite catering to the Philippine market will make money and that pent-up demand will drive growth. The reach of a single satellite is far more extensive than what any terrestrial network can achieve.

Van der Heyden said a medium-sized satellite should be able to find clients for its on-board transponders in about three to four years based on the rapid demand for Internet and other nationwide communication requirements.

“The demand is high and the market huge, and this can sustain a number of Philippine satellites,” believes Van der Heyden, who has made the Philippines his second home for the last 10 years.

Broadband Internet via satellite

One of the key engines that will fuel demand for satellite communications will be wireless broadband Internet access and video applications. Van der Heyden said the incredible growth of the Internet is killing cellular companies because they can’t distribute wireless broadband Internet fast enough and maintain acceptable quality.

Globally, the Internet relies on satellites for “backhaul” or the link between a core network such as a telecommunications provider or a broadcast network to the small sub-networks that distribute content. The point-to-multipoint capability of a satellite makes backhaul via satellite cheaper and more reliable than terrestrial telecommunications.

“It (backhaul) doesn’t exist here,” Van der Heyden pointed out.

What exists here is an expensive but vulnerable network of terrestrial cellular and fixed broadband base stations that rely on fiber optic cables to distribute content throughout the archipelago. The result is very expensive Internet and slow download speeds.

The dearth of broadband capacity is also the reason for the popularity of WiMax or the Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access. WiMax is a technology that provides wireless broadband access to a wider area covering several kilometers.

WiMax is gaining traction because it’s an economical solution to the “last mile problem” that makes current Internet technologies such as 3G so expensive. Despite this, WiMax can only reach out to a few kilometers as against a satellite that can provide wireless broadband service to subscribers in an area hundreds of kilometers in size.

A satellite is ideal for bringing broadband to the last mile of residences and businesses, thereby lowering Internet costs. Satellite networks are also extremely predictable compared to terrestrial Internet Protocol networks that are a mix of different networks. This means satellite networks can deliver a constant and uniform quality of service to thousands of locations, irrespective of geography.

If Europe and North America continue to build and launch satellites focused on Internet service, then there should be no question of a satellite’s value to an archipelago that has limited terrestrial infrastructure to cover its 7,000 islands.

When the Philippines started thinking satellites in the 1990s, the Department of Transportation and Communications spearheaded the formation of a consortium of telecom companies that invested millions of pesos to launch Agila since a single company was unable to raise the $300 to $400 million needed to launch the satellite.

We need incentives of this sort today to enable a consortium to launch a new Philippine satellite. Van der Heyden suggested that the government could provide enough incentives and tax breaks to encourage investors in the satellite business.

The government can also help by guaranteeing its own capacity requirements on the new satellite. This capacity can be used for secure government communications, especially those made by the Armed Forces of the Philippines, and by commercial, business, banking, remote education and disaster recovery efforts.

Van der Heyden believes a firm government commitment to lease transponders could generate enough funding to launch a minimum of one or likely two satellites.

And if the private Filipino consortium wants to cut costs further, it can opt not to build a new satellite but instead partner with foreign business firms to buy a small satellite.

This will allow the partners to split costs and do commercial deals. The aim is to generate a faster return on investment by leasing transponders faster while reserving capacity for Philippine government needs.

A satellite transponder is a device that receives a radio signal and automatically transmits a different signal, often without changing the content of the received signal. Communications satellites earn money through transponder leasing.

Former MSC President Garie Pimentel, who is now an ABS executive, said the Southeast Asian satellite market is very competitive. The rising number of countries in Asia orbiting their own national satellites has resulted in overcapacity.

He said the new trends lean toward “hosted payloads,” “condo-sats” and other joint ventures. It is not essential that a country own a satellite if it cannot afford one.

National security needs

The pressing needs of national security demand the Philippines gain control over its international communications, especially military communications via satellite. Secure military communications are vital for effective national action in conflict or potential conflict areas such as the West Philippine Sea.

This country cannot and should never rely on Indonesia or Malaysia, and especially China, to handle or control its military communications for obvious national security reasons.

The primordial business need to seize competitive advantages is bound to drive Filipino businessmen, especially those involved in information and communications technology, to once again consider the profitable opportunities that accrue from operating their own commercial satellite.

Now is the time to do so.

 

(Art Villasanta and Peter Galace have been writing about satellites and the space industry for a decade. They co-authored a market study on Philippine telecommunications for an international research firm.)









Recent Stories:

Asia shares mostly up, dollar approaches 105 yen 40 mins elapsed DOH, Philhealth to let poor patients avail of free cataract surgery 41 mins elapsed Ex-nuisance presidential bet tagged in NAIA-3 bomb try 43 mins elapsed Soldier killed, another hurt in clash with NPA in Davao Occidental town—report 1 hour elapsed Milo Sogueco’s ‘Mariquina,’ other Filipino indie films to be shown in Busan 1 hour elapsed 2 slain in Laguna shootout 2 hours elapsed Activist archbishop not surprised by junking of impeach raps vs Aquino 2 hours elapsed Versatile Viggo Mortensen speaks French in ‘Far From Men’ 2 hours elapsed
Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

  • DamayDamayLang

    May isang ISP company dito sa Pinas na nagkakaprob sa network traffic… ano ang sagot sa problema? — Download Cap!!! Limit sa 25GB per month, else, slow down connection mo…

    Tsk tsk tsk… kailan kaya sila makakapag-isip ng tamang direksyon sa mga problema?…  

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/KMRCLJVDSH2TB6AMNVNI6SLJ3M Ben

    And fiber optic is without perils?  With the news of hackers abound, it shows how Ph is so behind in all fronts and how so vulnerable.  So military communications at this time be relied piggyback to China and Japan and US infra?  Maybe so. after all, AFP has proven to be a square on round pegs anyway.  Take the case of Mr. Mapua, made and demoed drones that PH guys can! yet, AFP went to buy foreign.  So where do you throw the f. optics business?  Mas mura?  Call Huawei Shenshen, Guandong.

  • http://joboni96.myopenid.com/ joboni96

    fiber optic is better

    mas mura
    higher bandwidth
    easier maintenance
    within our tech envelope
    not affected by solar events

    satellite salesman ito

  • http://www.eyewebmaster.com Rosendo A. Cuyasen

     Satellite in the Philippines should be improve for us to sustain our growing technology and economy. I believe that putting more budget on satellite will help the Philippines compete with other country in Asia.

  • Pablo Juan

    Unless its in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) using a satellite for internet traffic barely works for realtime applications (we tried it for a few months).. that’s because a geo synchronous satellite needs to have a higher orbit and at the speed of light it takes > 250 msecs for data to go up the satellite, down to a receiver, routed to the ultimate destination and back the same route for the response resulting in lags and pauses.  Fiber optic cables under the ocean is more cost efficient and has far better latency.. so as far as the telco business is concerned, the satellite can still be used but as a ‘backup’ back-haul and not the primary link. Its still good though for broadcasting (like TV and radio) as well as reconnaissance. So the buy-in here for our government to have its own satellite is to have a ready platform for weather, S&R, Government communications — military/police as well as protecting our borders.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/KMRCLJVDSH2TB6AMNVNI6SLJ3M Ben

    The Philippines and its government and to some extent it hopes with business counterpart to go as backward as possible, you know like- the church maybe…like ok guys lets do this slow by slow, we will success one day.   Technology comes like party pooper, such that it will come to light who are into drug business or arms coming by the borders in the south?  Ph cannot implement a national ID to weed out crime.  Pollution caused by diesel jeepneys has been there since the 60s.  New automobiles are coming out do not have catalytic converters, and yet pretend the government are doing its controls by smoke checks?   Like some American Republicans, many government officials from top to down needs to take remedial science classes.

  • Karabukov

    It would be interesting to know how our neighbors in Southeast Asia are using these infrastructures in the sky commercially and governmentally with their enhanced radio, television and internet speed and bandwidth capabilities. It is quite easy to see why Indonesia, the world’s largest archipelagic nation would benefit from satellite technology and we should ask ourselves why the Philippines is not following Indonesia’s lead. Nine satellites seems quite a lot even for a multi-island nation of its size and I wonder how effectively and efficiently it is employing them. On the other hand, having the experience of one satellite should have given us a better idea of its potential. Instead the only one we ever had was sold or allowed to blink off. Why? The investment potential of a new communications satellite can only attract those who know how and how much it will be used and how profitably it can be operated. Given the enormous capital that it entails, the government, i.e, President Aquino and Congress have to spearhead its accelerated deployment starting from tax incentives and other commercial considerations, but with the objectives and a vision of its full utilization clearly in mind. We can’t allow ourselves to be left behind by our neighbors, again, do we? We don’t even have to look too far, with South Korea being the prime example of a digitally connected nation that has progressed rapidly economically with technology as its driving force.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/PQEBDB76MCEATPOXIZ3RGY5DAU Envy Villasenor

    this is one subject we really need to address to. i hope there will be a positive action to this one.



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement Advertisement
Advertisement
Marketplace