Quantcast

Netizens lap up Napoles interview with Inquirer

By |


“Kalurkey! Ano ba talaga, Ateh?”

Netizen Kishbuff was not alone in her confusion with Janet Lim-Napoles’ responses to a round-table interview with Inquirer editors, columnists and reporters. The first installment of the verbatim transcript was published Sunday and had gone viral on the Internet.

“Isip-isip muna ateng bago sumugod,” reader Dome Cabias (@IamAstroDome) gave a belated advice to the Basilan-bred businesswoman who now lives in a posh condominium in Bonifacio Global City.

“For a while I thought it was a 21st century revival of the Theater of the Absurd,” film director Jose Javier Reyes (@DirekJoey) tweeted.

These were among the reactions to the Inquirer interview on Thursday with Napoles, the alleged mastermind of a scheme that funneled P10 billion in pork barrel of five senators and 23 members of the House of Representatives over the past 10 years through a network of fake nongovernment organizations.

As of press time Sunday night, readers of Inquirer.net have shared Part I of the Napoles interview with more than 26,000 of their friends via Facebook, Twitter and other social media.

An Inquirer series on the misuse of the Priority Development Assistance Fund, the official name of the pork barrel, is supported by signed affidavits from six former Napoles employees who have turned whistle-blowers.

Without lawyer

Napoles has denied all allegations. She granted the Inquirer an interview without the presence of her lawyer.

“Excellent meeting between Janet Napoles and the PDI people. Janet Napoles has CLEARLY articulated herself and we now understand her better!” netizen pipsirho commented on Inquirer.net

“Ano daw? Dapat nag prepare muna to script niya,” NicksonCabote (@nickson_uno) commented.

The Inquirer round-table discussion with Napoles should be titled “UNINTELLIGIBLE” wrote ProfessionalHeckler (@HecklerForever).

“I can’t help but laugh at the @inquirerdotnet’s interview [with] Mrs. Napoles. I pity the woman for her self-inflicted embarrassment,” AlizednyDitucalan (@zedditucalan) said on Twitter.

“A verbose but meaningless interview with the wacky Janet,” another reader, Chit Ruiz (@ecruz_cpa), concluded.

Some sympathetic

Some readers, though, were sympathetic to Napoles. “I think she’s being ‘bullied.’ Just saying,” Pepe Alas (@Pepe_Alas) posted on Twitter.

In the round-table discussion, Napoles complained that the Inquirer had not been getting her side. When asked what exactly was lacking in the Inquirer stories about her, she said she would explain the matter at the proper forum.

“This interview proves that you don’t have be smart and/or intelligent to scam P10B. As long as you have yung ano, alam mo na kung ano yung ano,” commented a netizen who used the name milespacker.

“Good thing PDI is reporting the interview verbatim … . it says a lot of things about this scheming and cunning woman,” Julian de Sota said.

Sofia Selden made this observation: “Throughout the published transcript she made exactly one coherent remark, and it was to tell off the photographer for taking pictures of her ‘haggard’ face.”

“Pure entertainment. A wicked businesswoman reaching out and looking forward to bribing a single reporter but instead found herself in a round-table interview with the whole assemblage. Pity the junkie trying to feign innocence. That’s why we are moved… if we are moved,” Jack Phalaphitac said.

Speculations

Napoles’ decision to “enter the lion’s den” also sparked speculation among netizens.

“I think she went to make an offer … to buy [off] inquirer!!!!”  netizen eight_log commented.

“I have a feeling that she went to Inquirer with the intention of bribing the editor. However, on a different note, I’ve read the series of articles written by Nancy Carvajal. I didn’t appreciate the way she mixed her personal opinion with facts,” said netizen steph_abc.

Netizen Pacifico Falayfay wrote: “PDI should ask themselves what could be the reasons of Napoles’ visit. Well, if you don’t know whom to trust, naturally the last bastion is the media. Maybe she was surprised by the panel interview.”

“Going to the Inquirer or to any newspaper office does not help Janet Lim Napoles at all. It’s not the proper venue to air her side. JLN must go to the court when summoned, and let the lawyers on both sides prove and disprove any allegations,” zahraff wrote.

Rizal Bayani said: “She was asking for a one on one interview/meeting with the Editor-in-Chief only. Ano kaya motive nya? To ask to be interviewed to air her side of the story? I doubt. She doesn’t seem prepared to answer questions and would rather not talk about the merit of her case. So what was her purpose? Your guess is as good as mine.”

Not all happy

But not all seemed happy with running the transcript in verbatim.

“It should not have been published. Did not understand the point. Waste of space,” Reese Mojica (@reesemojica) wrote.

“I did not like the fact that she has to be the one to ask for it. For me, she’s using Inquirer for her own interests,” John Davis Mangubat (@TheGreatDavis)) wrote.

“My head is aching for Janet Napoles,” sean_javier said.—With reports from JV Rufino and Ramon Royandoyan









Recent Stories:

Senate panel OKs lower budget for Binay’s office 1 min elapsed Erasersheads in mini reunion 4 mins elapsed Beijing asks Manila to probe anti-China plot 10 mins elapsed Escudero: Unreported kidnappings rising 22 mins elapsed Dengue fever strikes models in Japan 24 mins elapsed De Lima: Naia 3 was one of four bomb targets 33 mins elapsed DFA in talks with UN on surrender controversy 37 mins elapsed Gabe Norwood puts on show in Fiba World Cup 41 mins elapsed
Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

  • boymanok

    nagtago na..ano pa ibig sabihin nun?

  • batangpaslit

    chuckles…
    pag kuwan, kuwan talaga si kuwan dahil kuwan ang kanyang alam mo na, kuwan eh.
    admittedly, however, she’s well versed in “escape and evasion” strategy. she was never “cornered” in the “interview”

  • RedRose_13

    Now she is into hiding, what now? Puro tayo iniputan sa ulo, and I guess humahalakhak siya bawat oras sa kanyang pagtatago. CATCH ME IF YOU CAN. Smart lady, ika nga… naisahan ang bansang Pilipinas!!! At this point, she is eating delicious foods and watching videos in an air-condition room, with a guarantee of safe and luxurious lifetime and retirement. And then, malilimutan ng ito ng forgetful pinoys. And according to her, “And I live happily ever and after.”

    • batangpaslit

      temporary lang ang kaligayahan nia….her sins will catch up with her sooner.

  • RedRose_13

    Good observation of the interview. It is like no one is serious about interviewing her. Para palang nabastos tuloy ang ini-interview.

  • koolkid_inthehouse

    NO Tulfo brothers in the round table?

  • Guest

    clearly, the only reason why

  • Juan Martin Miranda

    i don’t think napoles is that stupid and go to PDI, and get grilled just like that. for all we know, this could the first episode of the show that she and her team is launching. let’s wait a couple of days after this Napolis-PDI series has been published in PDI. i’m pretty sure they are excited to air the second episode of the show and PDI so as the citizens will get off guard! ^_^

  • bit coin

    May balak yang si Napoles na tumakbong senator kaya nagpa interview sa PDI. Hindi ako magtataka kung may susunod pa sa mga TV naman. Talking about STRIKE WHILE THE IRON IS HOT and TAKING THE DISADVANTAGE AS AN ADVANTAGE.
    kapalmuks talaga.

  • bravox44

    NAG-AANO-ANOHAN LANG YAN PARA MAANO SA KANYA ANG TAONG BAYAN, DI BA NO?? Trans; name your price reporters,,she’s got you covered by her millions.,,,,nagpapa awa pa ang ha#^%p na to,,naawa ka ba sa mga magsasaka na ultimong pambili ng binhi dinugas mo pa,,,,pwe!!!

  • Juan

    Harhar. Trying to be funny, eh?



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement Advertisement
Advertisement
Marketplace