Judiciary’s VICC visit to strengthen fight vs. cybercrime

Judiciary’s CICC visit to strengthen fight vs. cybercrime

04:40 PM March 23, 2025
This is a photo from the Supreme Court's visit to the CICC.
JUDICIARY VISIT. Cybercrime Investigation and Coordinating Center (CICC) Executive Director Alexander K. Ramos welcomed members of the Supreme Court’s Special Committee On Cybercrime and Electronic Evidence at the National Cybercrime Hub in Bonifacio Global City, Taguig City. CICC briefed members of the SC Committee on the mandate and tools used in the prevention and suppression of cybercrime.

TAGUIG, Philippines — Members of the Supreme Court’s Special Committee on Cybercrime and Electronic Evidence received a briefing on the mandate of operations of the Cybercrime Investigation and Coordinating Center (CICC) pursuant to RA 10175. 

On March 21, the SC Committee, with Court of Appeals Associate Justices Hon. Jose Lorenzo Dela Rosa and Hon. Wilhelmina Jorge-Wagan visited the National Cybercrime Hub in Bonifacio Global City, Taguig City. 

Members of the following organizations were also present during the meeting: 

  • The Office of the Chief Justice, Regional Trial Courts, and Metropolitan Trial Courts
  • Philippine National Police Anti-Cybercrime Group
  • National Bureau of Investigation
  • University of the Philippine Law Center, Technology Law and Policy Program

The visit follows the incident when the SC fell victim to fake news. The Committee is working to amend the Rules on Cybercrime Warrants. 

FEATURED STORIES

Also, the Department of Justice has formed a technical working group to enhance Cybercrime Investigation and Prosecution guidelines. 

CICC Executive Director Alexander K. Ramos welcomed the Supreme Court members. 

“This is a chance for us to demonstrate to the judiciary the modern techniques and technologies available for law enforcers in the conduct of their mandates,” he said. 

Article continues after this advertisement

Their visit is also an opportune time to explain to the judiciary the complexity of electronic evidence.

Article continues after this advertisement

The chain of custody of evidence was among the Supreme Court Committee’s major issues. 

CICC agents explained that electronic evidence is usually in law enforcers’ custody. However, they request assistance from the CICC because of its advanced tools. 

Article continues after this advertisement

Moreover, the cybercrime agency briefed the SC on various tools for preventing and suppressing cybercrime.

These included the anti-deepfake detector, chainalysis, IMSI detector, and social media listening and monitoring platforms. 

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TOPICS:
TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2025 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.