Palau bans 'reef-toxic' sunscreen | Inquirer Technology

Palau bans ‘reef-toxic’ sunscreen

/ 12:58 PM January 01, 2020

FILE – In this June 13, 2009 file photo, children play at a resort beach in Ngerkebesang, Palau. In an attempt to protect the coral reefs that divers so admire they have dubbed them the underwater Serengeti, the Pacific nation of Palau has banned many types of sunscreen. Banned sunscreens will be confiscated from tourists who carry them into the country, and merchants selling the banned products will be fined up to $1,000. (AP Photo/Itsuo Inouye, File)

KOROR, Palau — Palau’s pioneering ban on “reef-toxic” sunscreens took effect Wednesday as the tiny Pacific island nation introduced strict environmental measures that also include one of the world’s largest marine sanctuaries.

“We have to live and respect the environment because the environment is the nest of life, and without it nobody in Palau can survive,” President Tommy Remengesau told AFP as the new laws took effect.

Article continues after this advertisement

Palau, which lies in the western Pacific about halfway between Australia and Japan, is renowned for its marine life and is regarded as one of the world’s best diving destinations, but the government is concerned its popularity is coming at a cost.

FEATURED STORIES

Remengesau said there was scientific evidence that the chemicals found in most sunscreens were toxic to corals, even in minute doses.

With Palau’s popular dive sites regularly packed with tourists, there were concerns a build-up of these chemicals would irreparably harm the reefs.

Article continues after this advertisement

From New Year’s day, any reef-toxic sunscreen imported or sold in Palau will be confiscated and the owner will be fined US$1,000.

Article continues after this advertisement

“When science tells us that a practice is damaging to coral reefs, to fish populations, or to the ocean itself, our people take note and our visitors do too,” Remengesau said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Toxic sunscreen chemicals have been found throughout Palau’s critical habitats, and in the tissues of our most famous creatures.

“We don’t mind being the first nation to ban these chemicals, and we will do our part to spread the word. With better education and awareness, more jurisdictions will have the confidence to take this necessary action.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The science is clear, and once that message has spread, we will be the first of many.”

Along with the sunscreen ban, Palau’s much-touted marine sanctuary came into effect on January 1, closing 80 percent of its exclusive economic zone (EEZ) to fishing and other marine activities including mining and shark finning.

“It is a very ambitious and worthy goal for Palau’s future,” Remengesau said. The marine sanctuary prohibits commercial fishing in about 500,000 square kilometers (190,000 square miles) of the ocean.

The legislation also requires most foreign fleets working in the limited fishing area to land their catch in Palau and then pay an export tax.

Environment Minister Umiich Sengebau said the law ensures Palau has the first rights to purchase fish caught in the area to satisfy the local demand before exports are allowed.

Remengesau said the ban was needed to “let the ocean heal” after years of mass commercial fishing in the Pacific that has seen stocks of some species such as bluefin tuna fall to critical levels.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

It follows Palau’s establishment of the world’s first shark sanctuary in 2009 to prevent finning — a practice that sees fish have their fins hacked off before they are thrown back into the sea to die.

Edited by MUF
TOPICS: Environment, Oceans, Palau, sunscreen
TAGS: Environment, Oceans, Palau, sunscreen

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.