Quantcast

Gov’t to present arguments for Cybercrime law before SC

By |


Alliance of youth organizations and institutions against cybercrime law held a vigil in front of the Supreme Court building in Padre Faura in Manila on Jan. 14, 2013, the eve of the high tribunal’s hearing on the oral arguments against the controversial law. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines–Government lawyers on Tuesday will present their arguments before the Supreme Court on the legality of Republic Act 10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012.

Last week, the high court heard the petitioners questioning the constitutionality of the Cybercrime Law.

Among the questioned provisions of the law were on Internet libel, the authority of the Department of Justice to take down Internet data if found to be violating RA 10175, collection of traffic data, cybersex issue and prosecution for violating this law and a separate prosecution and conviction for the same crime under the Revised Penal Code.

Representatives of the petitioners — UP law Professor Harry Roque Jr., Bayan Muna Representative Neri Colmenares, Philippine Bar Association legal counsel Rodel Cruz, UP Prof. Jesus Disini, and Julius Matibag of the National Union of People’s Lawyers — cited violation of the due process clause, search and seizure, prohibition against double jeopardy or being prosecuted for the same offense twice, vagueness of the law, right to free speech as among the many constitutional provisions which to be violated if the law will be implemented.

Solicitor-General Francis Jardeleza will lead government lawyers in defending the legality of the Cybercrime Law.

Last October 9, the high court stopped the implementation of the Anti-Cybercrime law for 120 days which will lapse on February 5.

Petitioners already asked the high court last week to extend the restraining order. Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno said it will be discussed in future court sessions.








Recent Stories:

S&P 500 at new record on Apple earnings; Dow drops 27 mins elapsed Senators’ suspension not penalty, says Drilon 28 mins elapsed SC order prompts fund release via DAP, says DAR exec 31 mins elapsed Fil-Am is behind Kwoller, the price-tracking mobile app for shoppers 40 mins elapsed Roxas asked for detailed accounting of how PNP spent P3.2B in DAP funds 52 mins elapsed UN rights chief warns of possible Gaza war crimes 1 hour elapsed China supplier of suspect meat has global reach 1 hour elapsed China deletes Web reports on blow-up giant toad 1 hour elapsed
Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

  • WeAry_Bat

    If this law pushes through…

  • kalikasanipagtanggol

    Present arguments sabay sundot at kindat!



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement Advertisement
Advertisement
Marketplace