Don't be fooled by appealing aesthetics of food | Inquirer Technology

When it comes to food, don’t be fooled by appealing aesthetics

/ 05:57 PM November 12, 2020
20201112 Food aesthetics nutrition

On the whole, study participants tended to consider ‘ugly’ food as less natural and nutritious than ‘pretty’ food, though there was no real difference. Image: IStock/grafvision via AFP Relaxnews.

Food presentation may be important, but food advertising images, which play heavily on aesthetic techniques like symmetry and contrasting colors, can be misleading for consumers.

As the holiday season approaches, food marketers are pulling out all the stops to present their festive fare. From succulent smoked salmon to cakes and desserts in all the colors of the rainbow, these are enough to make your mouth water. But while certain foods may look appealing, that does not automatically make them the healthiest or most nutritious choices.


It may sound obvious, yet that is an error frequently made by consumers, as per a study published last Sept. 14 on the Journal of Marketing. Through a series of experiments involving 4,300 volunteers, the study sought to determine how classic aesthetics used in food presentation (symmetry, patterns, colors) can influence consumer choice and skew perception. For example, participants were asked to look at photos of foods as well as samples of real food then evaluate them as healthy or unhealthy, and processed or unprocessed.

In another experiment, 400 volunteers evaluated two images of avocado toast: one showing “neatly sliced crescents of delicate avocado arrayed on the toast” and the other showing the avocado as “a chunky green glop smeared on the bread.” Participants were asked to rate the pictures on healthiness, naturalness and tastiness. A great number of them said that the first image of avocado toast looked “healthier” and “more natural.”


A natural penchant for ‘pretty’ food

Similar results were found in other experiments. In fact, on the whole, individuals who took part in the study showed a tendency to find “ugly” food less natural and nutritious than “pretty” food, even though there was no real difference.

“Consumers expect food to be more nutritious, less fatty and contain fewer calories when it looks pretty based on classical aesthetic principles, and that bias can affect consumer choices and willingness to pay for food,” explained Linda Hagen, the study’s lead author and an assistant professor of marketing at the USC Marshall School of Business.

To counter these misleading effects, the researchers suggested that companies or regulators consider taking measures such as adding disclaimers to food images in ads disclosing that products have been modified to enhance their healthy appearance.

“A statement that explicitly reminds people that pretty food was modified for depiction helped mitigate the effect in the lab, so disclaimers may be an effective way to protect consumers,” said Hagen. CC


Child advocate group wants gov’t to boost breastfeeding drive amid pandemic 

Exercise, diet more important than ever in pandemic  

The latest tech news delivered to your inbox

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.
TOPICS: aesthetics, Journal of Marketing, Nutrition, University of Southern California
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our technology news

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2022 | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.