Silicon Valley phone technology battle nears close | Inquirer Technology

Silicon Valley phone technology battle nears close

/ 08:24 PM April 29, 2014

apple-samsung-trial

AP FILE PHOTO

SAN JOSE, California — The Silicon Valley court battle between Apple and Samsung is entering its final phase.

Lawyers for both companies are expected to deliver closing arguments Tuesday before jurors are sent behind closed doors to determine a verdict in a closely watched trial over the ownership of smartphone technology.

Article continues after this advertisement

Each company accuses the other of stealing key features to develop some of the latest smartphones on the market, but Samsung’s newest device, the Galaxy S5 released earlier this month, is not at issue.

FEATURED STORIES

The four men and four women on the jury are to determine which company is right and how much is owed in damages. Apple Inc. is demanding $2.2 billion after arguing that nine of Samsung’s smartphones and one of its Galaxy tablets infringes five patents. Samsung Electronics Co. seeks a fraction of that figure, some $6 million, saying Apple infringed two of its patents in creating the iPhone.

Samsung also argues that if it is found to have infringed Apple’s patent, it owes only $38.4 million.

Article continues after this advertisement

Testimony wrapped up Monday with the recall of two expert witnesses to the stand to argue the effects of an appeals court ruling in an unrelated legal dispute between Apple and Motorola. The appeals court ruling upheld a trial judge’s definition of an Apple “quick link” patent that automatically turns phone numbers and email addresses into links, enabling users to make calls and send messages with a single click.

Article continues after this advertisement

Apple’s expert, Carnegie Mellon professor Todd Mowry, argued the definition adopted by the appeals court made little difference in the case and that he believes Samsung still infringed Apple’s patent for the “quick link” patent. Kevin Jeffay, a professor of computer science at the University of North Carolina and Samsung’s expert, argued the opposite, saying the definition adopted by the appeals court supports Samsung’s position that it didn’t infringe Apple’s patent.

Article continues after this advertisement

In the end, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh said the matter was best left for the jury to decide along with infringement questions of the other four patents. Jurors were read 53 pages of instructions Monday directing them how to decide whether an infringement occurred and how to calculate damages if fault is found.

Samsung and Apple have been locked in a worldwide struggle for dominance of the $330 billion annual market for smartphones. Samsung has captured about 31 percent of the market while Apple retains a 15 percent share.

Article continues after this advertisement

Apple contends that many of the key functions and vital features of Samsung phones important to consumers were invented by Apple. Samsung argues that its phones operate on the Google Android software system and that any legal complaint Apple has is with the search giant.

Google Inc. is not a party to the litigation. Google spokesman Matt Kallman declined to comment.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

A different jury in San Jose presiding over an earlier trial regarding older technology ordered Samsung to pay Apple $930 million. Samsung has appealed that ruling.

TOPICS: Apple, court battle, infotech, Samsung, smartphones
TAGS: Apple, court battle, infotech, Samsung, smartphones

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.