Quantcast

Sotto learns belatedly: We have law on online libel

By |


Senator Vicente Sotto III

MANILA, Philippines—With or without the cybercrime law, Internet users could still be charged with libel under the Revised Penal Code, Senate Majority Leader Vicente “Tito” Sotto III said on Tuesday.

And Sotto admitted that he was not aware of the existence of the online libel law when he proposed it to be included in the cybercrime act.

“There are studies that are being conducted now. And I am informed that if it would be stricken down (libel provision in the cybercrime law), there’ll be no problem. The libel stays in the Revised Penal Code so it can still be used whether you use a computer or not,” he told reporters on Tuesday.

“That’s according to my source in the Department of Justice,” he said.

Asked by this reporter why Congress then still included online libel in the cybercrime law, Soto said, “E hindi namin alam dati. Ngayon lang nalalaman (We didn’t know that before. We just learned about it now).”

“Siguro reiteration lang ‘yon (Maybe it is just a reiteration). Libel has always been there,” he pointed out.

Asked again if the online libel was clear in the Revised Penal Code, the senator said, “Parang ganon e.. ‘Yon ang interpretation ng DOJ. I’ll look into it to make sure.”

But Sotto said he would still leave it up to the Supreme Court to decide whether or not to keep the online libel provision in the new law.

He also remained hopeful that the high tribunal would not strike down the entire law as demanded by netizens.

The senator was notably careful to comment on the Supreme Court’s decision to stop the implementation of the cybercrime law specially when asked if the ruling might have been influenced by strong opposition from various sectors.

“I told you I’d rather not comment. I’m having second thoughts,” he said in between laughs.

Asked if he has been affected by criticisms he is getting, Sotto answered no. However, he pointed out that he has always been caught in the middle so he would rather let the main authors of the law to comment on the issue.








Recent Stories:

Let DPWH do its job, says official sued by MMDA 19 mins elapsed Idiosyncratic, refined Chinese fusion–but purists beware 60 mins elapsed Seafood glass noodle salad 1 hour elapsed Quezon City gets busy for diamond jubilee 1 hour elapsed ‘Everything in Bituin’ in Triple Threats 3 hours elapsed Joyce Pilarsky’s JPP Daring Collections bring glamour, luxe in Cinderella 3 hours elapsed No use bashing her; she doesn’t care 3 hours elapsed Filipinos join HK protests 4 hours elapsed
Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.




  • http://twitter.com/TUBAGBOHOLcom TUBAGBOHOL.com

    So many laws were passed and enacted and they don’t know what they are doing. This is a tragic fate of Filipinos being governed by fools and idiots.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Zahl/1670371040 Steven Zahl

    LYING THIEF na, BOBO pa.



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement
Advertisement
Marketplace