De Lima: We can’t stop website promoting adultery but… | Inquirer Technology

De Lima: We can’t stop website promoting adultery but…

/ 05:09 PM December 01, 2014

ashelymadison

The website that is now under the Department of Justice’s watch.

MANILA, Philippines – The Department of Justice’s (DOJ) hands are tied in dealing with the recently launched website that promotes illicit affair.

Justice Secretary Leila De Lima said the “Take Down” clause under the Cybercrime law was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. It was supposed to empower the DOJ to block computer data found to be in violation of the law.

Article continues after this advertisement
Justice Secretary Leila de Lima. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

Justice Secretary Leila de Lima. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

The DOJ’s option, De Lima said, is urging telecom companies to block the site.

FEATURED STORIES

“Ang pinapa-search ko if may provision that can provide legal cover for us to compel telcos to precisely do that (ban the website) because it tends to encourage illegal acts,” De Lima explained.

She said adultery is punishable under the Revised Penal Code “and based on what we see or what we hear about the particular website is that it encourages extramarital affairs and adulterous acts.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The website, which has a tagline “Life is short. Have an affair” with a Filipino translation “Buhay ay maikli. Mangaliwa” was banned in Singapore and Korea.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TOPICS: Department of Justice, infotech, News
TAGS: Department of Justice, infotech, News

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.