DOJ cybercrime office sees no need for law vs Internet libel | Inquirer Technology

DOJ cybercrime office sees no need for law vs Internet libel

/ 04:31 PM February 19, 2014

Department of Justice building. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—The Department of Justice’s Cybercrime Office does not see the need to have a law against internet libel.

Justice Assistant Secretary Geronimo Sy, head of the DOJ’s Cybercrime Office, said Cybercrime Law should deal with the core of cybercrime, which is hacking, phishing, child pornography and ATM fraud among others.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said the provision on Internet libel was a mere insertion by the people from Congress.

FEATURED STORIES

“[Libel] is not what we need in a Cybercrime legal law enforcement issue…,” Sy said. With the online libel, complaint could pile up because gossips even lovers quarrel, family arguments are posted on social media.

“If there are 100 complaints, 99 of which is Internet libel and one is on child pornography, that one case is the more important. Taxpayers money will go to waste if we will focus on the 99 complaints for internet libel,” Sy said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Sy said by March or April, they will submit an amendment to the Cybercrime Law without the provision on internet libel.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said the country already has a provision against libel in the Revised Penal Code.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Libel in the Cybercrime Prevention Act is the same libel we have in the Revised Penal Code only the mode of commission is different,” Sy said.

The head of the DOJ’s Cybercrime Office said they fought hard to take out the provision on Internet libel in 2012.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We fought it all the way from the House, Senate, Bicam…Our legal position on online libel is it is not a priority in terms of criminal law enforcement mas maraming malalalang problema,” Sy said.

The high court on Tuesday declared as constitutional the provision on Internet libel with respect to the author of the article. However, the high court ruled that there is no Internet libel with respect to those who received and reacted on the libellous article.

RELATED STORIES

SC: Online libel law legal

Poe: Child porn underscores importance of cybercrime law

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Cybercrime law foes unhappy over SC ruling

Initially published on February 19, 2014. Updated on August 8, 2023.
TOPICS: Cybercrime law, infotech, News
TAGS: Cybercrime law, infotech, News

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.